Trans-anal prolapsed gangrenous intussusception in infant
Ayman Elhosny, Behrouz Banieghbal
Corresponding author: Ayman Elhosny, Paediatric Surgery Department at Tygerberg Children´s Hospital, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
Received: 27 Aug 2020 - Accepted: 12 Nov 2020 - Published: 13 Nov 2020
Domain: Pediatric surgery
Keywords: Trans-anal, rectal, prolapse, intussusception, gangrenous, infant
©Ayman Elhosny et al. PAMJ Clinical Medicine (ISSN: 2707-2797). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cite this article: Ayman Elhosny et al. Trans-anal prolapsed gangrenous intussusception in infant. PAMJ Clinical Medicine. 2020;4:95. [doi: 10.11604/pamj-cm.2020.4.95.25780]
Available online at: https://www.clinical-medicine.panafrican-med-journal.com//content/article/4/95/full
Trans-anal prolapsed gangrenous intussusception in infant
Ayman Elhosny1,&, Behrouz Banieghbal1
&Corresponding author
A 4-months-old boy who was previously well, was referred from a primary health service with 4 days history of progress non-bilious vomiting and rectal prolapse. The infant looks dehydrated, lethargic and irritable. In abdominal examination was essentially normal but rectally revealed prolapse gangrenous mass with a gap between the prolapse part and the anus, which allow the examining finger to pass between it. These findings were consistent with diagnosis of prolapse intussusception (A). Urgent laparotomy was undertaken with extended right hemicolectomy after excision of the gangrenous bowel. Ileo-sigmoid colon anastomosis was performed. It is important for clinicians to know “how to differentiate between the rectal prolapse that should be reduced manually in contrast to prolapsed intussusception which requires laparotomy”? This is simply done by rectal examination (B,C). This permits the treating doctor to swiftly decide on proper treatment preference.
Figure 1: (A) trans-anal prolapsed gangrenous Intussusception (black arrow); (B, C) schematic representations show the clinical findings to differentiate between the rectal prolapse and prolapsed Intussusception: (B) rectal prolapse; straight section of the rectum is prolapsed with an outward appearance of anal crypts (red arrow) and no gap between the prolapsed part and the anus (black arrows); (C) prolapsed Intussusception; the prolapsed part curves due to mesenteric traction (red arrow) as well as a gap on the side of the prolapsed part and the anal verge, which allows for the examining finger to pass in between the two structures (black arrows)